A significant investment in applications might result in a worthwhile product if proper validation is performed at each stage of development. Testing takes up 25 percent to 40 percent of any project’s schedule. Testing has evolved into a critical component of the SDLC and a specialized function in and of itself.
Our tried-and-true testing methodology makes use of a variety of industry-standard testing tools and procedures for planning, process management, performance measurements, test automation, test execution, defect tracking, and reporting. This translates to higher-quality software, better business preparedness, and a significant competitive advantage.
A significant investment in applications might result in a worthwhile product if proper validation is performed at each stage of development. Testing takes up 25 percent to 40 percent of any project’s schedule. Testing has evolved into a critical component of the SDLC and a specialized function in and of itself.
Our tried-and-true testing methodology makes use of a variety of industry-standard testing tools and procedures for planning, process management, performance measurements, test automation, test execution, defect tracking, and reporting. This translates to higher-quality software, better business preparedness, and a significant competitive advantage.
We administer both Functional and Non-Functional testing:
- System (Integration) testing
- Regression testing
- User acceptance testing
- Usability testing
- Performance, load, volume and stress testing
- Test automation
- Environment management handling data, release and configuration management
- Environment management handling data, release and configuration management
Value addition:
We work hard to instill a spirit of innovation in all of our testing professionals and to share what we learn with customers on a regular basis. Diverse Lynx uses deep technology, process, and strategy expertise to help our clients develop testing strategies. Some of our distinguishing features include a 25-45 percent reduction in quality cost.
- 35-80% increase in testing effectiveness
- 20-40% reduction in time-to-market
- Higher predictability around testing
- Improved quality by continuous improvements